A crowd, from Latin multitūdo, is the abundance and multitude of people or stuff. For instance: “I tried to enter the stadium, but the crowd pushed me and I ended up hurt”, “A crowd gathered in front of the singer’s house to greet him on his birthday”.
It is interesting, in addition to all the above, to establish the concept of ochlocracy. This is a term that was used by the Greek philosopher Aristotle to define what the rule of the crowd was. For him this type of government was a way of degenerating what were the traditional forms of government.
The fact that the aforementioned Hellenic thinker manifests himself against or disparages the aforementioned type of government is fundamentally due to the fact that the crowd identifies itself as having an irrational, confused and vicious will of a certain type.
In the same way, one should not overlook the fact that the oclocracy is often identified with or confused with what has been called the tyranny of the majority. This tyranny is the one that develops when the masses use force to be able to get the reigning political leaders at all times to make a series of absolutely inappropriate decisions.
There are many thinkers who, throughout history, have been raising their hypotheses about the olocracy and democracy. Specifically, on how the latter has been able to degenerate into the other. One of those who has delved into it the most was the Swiss writer Jean-Jacques Rousseau who stated that this transition occurs as a consequence of the fact that different wills of a particular type are imposed on the general ones.
An event that is the result of the development of a series of tricks or tricks of various types.
There are several concepts linked to the notion of crowd. A crowd It is a multiplicity of subjects that act together to fulfill a common objective: “A crowd filled the town square to demand the resignation of the mayor”, “The Argentine tennis player was consecrated before a crowd that went to see the final of the tournament in the New York state”.
The idea of plebs it arose in Roman times to refer to those who were not patricians. The commoners, therefore, were part of the less privileged sectors of the society.
It is known as dough to the set of people who behave gregariously (“An angry mass destroyed the facilities of the town hall”), Meanwhile he town is the total number of people in a nation or country (“The people have expressed themselves at the polls”).
Each of these terms (crowd, multitude, plebs, mass, town) have different meanings, so they apply depending on the context. There are certain circumstances, however, where the use of one or the other concept is almost indistinct.
“A crowd went to the airport to greet the champion team” or “A crowd went to the airport to greet the champion team” They are phrases with a similar meaning and that can be used to describe the same situation.